The qualities that help people reach success in modern life cannot be learned in university or other academic institutions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is hard to overstate the importance of schooling: it decides what career you will have, what kind of person you will be and what type of life you will lead. However, in the era of everchanging world that put heavy emphasis on being pragmatic, some are questioning whether or not, being solely dependent on formal schooling equip people with necessary skillsets and tools for their future endeavors. I, from my own experience, hold firm belief that learning in modern days require more than just ordinarily attending classes and finishing assigned homework.
It is evident that school curriculums are constantly improved and re-structured in the pursuit for practicality as well as efficiency. For instance, students in Viet Nam, annually, are introduced with new teaching methodologies and newly innovated agenda that allot more time and lessons to on-the-field experiments and hand-on laboratory classes. However, due to the fact that this process of altering the system is rigorous and time-consuming, people start to look for a new approach.
With the advent of the internet, among all the new disruptive technologies rise a new platform of future open education: forums and blogs. Knowledge, from the dawn of time, has always revolved around the virtue of sharing and reinforcing that in the new era of virtual platforms that provide incessant means of publicizing your ideas, thrives as never seen before. Medium and Quora are prime examples of open knowledge base that people can learn and satisfy their curiosity with little to no cost
On top of that, in order to reach height in their career, job seekers need to be accustomed to thinking out of the box and make good use of the creativity to overcome obstacles. Reasons for this prioritization of creativeness are multifarious but the most common one is to blame on the glaring dominance of artificial intelligence over the job market. Traditional professionals such as sale clerks, accountants and farmers are being gradually replaced with automation and human-like robots, which in turn makes jobs that are humanly capable the only viable options for fresh graduates.
In conclusion, even though academic institutions still play an important role in teaching fundamentals to students, it is shifting toward proactive learning that requires learners to make good use of tools and platforms provided as the result of the advances of technologies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-26 | chinh11111 | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-26 | chinh11111 | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-30 | Naive Dinosaur | 72 | view |
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996,1998 and 2000 for 1996,1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 78
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments andlarge companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree ordisagree? 67
- As a part of education students should spend a period of time living in another country to learn its language and culture Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people say that art e g painting music poetry can be made by everyone whereas others believe that it can be only made by those with special abilities Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- In many countries the quality of life in the large cities is becoming worse What causes this problem What measure can be taken to solve it 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...n being pragmatic, some are questioning whether or not, being solely dependent on formal schoo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25388601036 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9622038533 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629533678756 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.9500645417 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.0 106.682146367 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1666666667 20.7667163134 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175443447741 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516552105412 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043149197793 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812094929039 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517736047852 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...n being pragmatic, some are questioning whether or not, being solely dependent on formal schoo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2028.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25388601036 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9622038533 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629533678756 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.9500645417 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.0 106.682146367 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1666666667 20.7667163134 155% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175443447741 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516552105412 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043149197793 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812094929039 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517736047852 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.