the charts give information about world forest and timber in different five regions
The first pie chart exhibits the contribution of forest in five regions to the world forest and the second chart gives information about the quantity of wood in each area.
Overall, in the first chart, North America and Africa dominated the pie, while Europe held the largest segment in the second chart.
As can be seen from the first chart, Asia contributed the smallest percentage of forest (14%) to the world jungle. Meanwhile the dominances of the pie belonged to Africa and North America, 27% and 25% of the world forest, correspondingly. South Africa and Europe comprised nearly the same proportion of the whole world jungle, 16% and 18%, respectively.
Turning to the second chart, the last rank was held by Africa (9%), while the percentage of timber in Asia was double (18%). North America still dominated the pie in which lumber held the quantity of 30%. South Africa and Europe still shared nearly a similarity in the proportion of wood in these regions, 23% and 20%, correspondingly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-04 | John Hason | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of people working different in sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 73
- Some people think that studying from the past teaches us nothing about today s life Others argue that history is a valuable source of information Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- the charts give information about world forest and timber in different five regions 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...tage of forest 14% to the world jungle. Meanwhile the dominances of the pie belonged to A...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, second, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96428571429 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66549719254 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.8799078725 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282332705335 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122159164797 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155052208157 0.0843802449381 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20107982056 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.184256215644 0.0819641961636 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.