The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to
encourage people from the suburbs or the countryside to live in the cities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a false dichotomy among the residents that the most fundamental way to tackle traffic, as well as transit problems in the cities is to motivate inhabitants from the suburbs or the countryside to reside in the municipalities. However, I completely disagree with this statement and express my notion in the following paragraphs with smooth examples, before a reasoned conclusion.
On the one side, traffic conjunction, transport issues have been becoming crucial all over the world. Mainly because of the majority of individuals, who reside in the countryside to move the cities because of their complicated lifestyle such as a lack of education, electricity, internet connection in urban places. For instance, the statistics illustrate that 60 percent of the residents, who live in our city came from the suburbs. It is undeniable that there are some long-term benefits to live in the center like gaining quality knowledge, finding out high-salary jobs, and others. Nevertheless, this causes tremendous demerits, which can bring a plethora of difficulties.
On the other side, the first and foremost drawback of migrating people from urban destinations leads to accelerating the number of traffic jams in the country. For example, it is indisputable that every person highly prefers departing their work with the help of their own transportation, which can give them robust opportunities and comfort. Secondly, as a result of increasing the amount of population, the rate of accidents will climb to some extent respectively. Furthermore, if the government create convenient chances and supply suburbs with sufficient energy and education, it would be the correct way of eradicating traffic and transport problems.
In conclusion, it is firmly evident, replacing inhabitants to reside in the cities is not a beneficial way to tackle transit issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-04 | Aarti SHARMAa | 84 | view |
| 2020-12-11 | nigora@ | 89 | view |
| 2020-11-16 | Gurjeet Kaur08 | 84 | view |
| 2020-11-15 | Gurjeet Kaur08 | 78 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities Derby and Nottingham Between 2000 and 2009 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- Scientists have been warning for many years that to protect the environment we have to limit the use of energy in our daily lives Despite warning many people do not pay attention to this What are the reasons for this and how can people be encouraged to sa 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of households with cars in a European country between 1971 and 2001 73
- The most effective way to solve traffic and transport problems in the cities is to encourage people from the suburbs or the countryside to live in the cities To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The typical teaching situation of a teacher and students in the class will not exist by the year 2050 To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...he rate of accidents will climb to some extend respectively. Furthermore, if the gover...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43252595156 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17429119135 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608996539792 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2442468141 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.833333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.4166666667 7.06120827912 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237407534132 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718701162252 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702084023651 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132935059635 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429372907213 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.