ecotourism
The reading and the lecturer are both about eco-tourism. The author of the reading mentions that there are three positive sides of the eco-tourism. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made in the article by explaining the reasons why Eco-Tourism is not a completely good thing.
To begin with, the author points out that Eco-Tourism serves as a substitute for forms of development, such as logging, farming, and manufacturing. Moreover, the writer mentioned that these forms could be a better alternative that causes less damage to the environment. The professor contradicts this point by saying that even if eco-tourism is a better alternative, still is not entirely effective. The professor points out that eco-tourism will need infrastructure, especially for building roads. Also, the professor explains this point by saying that it will have a negative consequence on the environment, which will cause more air and water pollution.
The second point that the author addresses is what would happen if the government decides to encourage eco-tourism. The writer elaborates on this by saying if government decides to focus on eco-tourism, more tourists will arrive, and it will increase the revenue for that place. Also, the author mentioned that eco-tourism will provide more jobs for local people, and consequently, they will have better conditions of life. One point the professor agrees with is that revenue will benefit local people, and it will create more jobs. On the other hand, the professor points out that these jobs will be the lowest paying, and it could create cultural pollution.
Finally, the author posits that if tourism increases, then the government will use their funds in order to protect the area. The professor refutes this point by saying that even if the place is protected, it cannot prevent illegal activities for occurring, such as hunting animals, stealing resources, and cutting down trees.
In conclusion, the author thinks that eco-tourism is a good idea because it will cause less damage to the environment. Also, he thinks that it will benefit all parts. In contrast, the professor agrees that eco-tourism is a better alternative than tourism, but also thinks it is not the perfect solution.
- ecotourism environment 3
- Comics medium. Summarize the main points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 83
- Summarize the main points made in the lecture, being sure to explain howthey challenge the specific points made in the reading passage. 3
- universal risk taking personalities 81
- comics 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 149, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...hree positive sides of the eco-tourism. The lecturer casts doubt on the claims made...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, if, moreover, second, so, still, then, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 5.04856512141 357% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 1373.03311258 137% => OK
No of words: 359.0 270.72406181 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23398328691 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.04702891845 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85720830991 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462395543175 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.0 419.366225166 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 16.0 8.23620309051 194% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.51434878587 462% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1307961695 49.2860985944 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.388888889 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9444444444 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.8541721854 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.