Many people think that some people are naturally good leader others think that people can learn leadership skills. Discussing both views and give your opinion.
In the fast-paced competitive era, certain individuals have natural administrator attributes as per the consideration of the majority people whereas opponents claim that such traits can be added by learning in their life. In my opinion, I, however, side with the latter thought. Before arriving, a concrete decision both perspectives will be examined in the following paragraphs.
Two glaring opinions of tremendous people who consider regarding few people' natural leadership talent are enumerated as following. Firstly, since there are various charismatic people who have different qualities by birth. For example, Sheed Bhagat singh who was an Indian socialist whose two acts of dramatic violence against the British. So, definitely in this respect, multifarious people have some effective born characteristics in any field. In addition to, in the present scenario, various people have been involved in politics owing to their rights. To cite an example, a person can not fight against the government unless he does not have great life skills. Hence, people can be natural leaders according to their environment.
Despite the above mentioned striking views in favour of few people, they are discussing rest people's views. Individuals should devote their spare moments to a team which can instill an effective leadership skill in their life. For instance, by playing any sports activity such as Cricket, football and hockey together with their members, that is also a better way to become a good leader. Apart from this, there are tons of institutes universally that provide different courses or diplomas to enhance people' qualities such as group discussion and practical work on every stream.
To compendium and reiterate my opinion, although some people have better leadership aspects naturally, remaining people are capable of acquiring such skills with the support of training and teamwork.
- In the past people made better use of their free times than they do today Do you agree or disagree 95
- Team activities can teach more skills for life that other activities which are played alone To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- The maps below shows the changes made in an Australian park in 2015 and now 61
- The diagrmas below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 100
- The leaders or directorsbof organization are often older people but some say that young people can also be a leader Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...heir life. For instance, by playing any sports activity such as Cricket, football and ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, regarding, so, still, whereas, apart from, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51712328767 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81684900196 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643835616438 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7007658579 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.4 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334668656795 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108392893936 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0796131122769 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199086199182 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461130506108 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.