The diagram below shows the changes made in an Australian park.
The given maps compare the transformations that have taken place in an Australian park.
Overall, it is lucid that an Australian park has undergone significant changes over the period shown with the introductions of beaches, a cafe, barbie cue and tennis.
Comparing two maps together is followed. Apparently, the ocean, a cycle path and park avenue have been located in the same direction as an Australian park since the period from 2015 to 2020. There were some trees on the west side of the park in the past, but now there have formulated beaches and a barbie cue on the right of the trees.
Although soccer field has remained constant on the same side of a park, the place of trees and a cafe has superseded in a park. Some trees are planted on the right side of the soccer field. Finally, there was a tree in the south of the soccer field where tennis is now constructed.
- The diagram shows the recycling of aluminium cans 40
- Some people believe that healthy eating and the importance of healthy food should be taught in schools Others say that parents should teach their kids about healthy food and diet Discuss both vies and give your opinion with relevant example 95
- Pressure on the school and university students is increasing and students are pushed to hard work when they are young Do you think it is a positive or a negative development 89
- An increasing number of people change their career and place of residence several times during their lifetime Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The graph shows the frequency of eating fast food at restaurant among people in the USA 2003 and 2013 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, finally, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 722.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56962025316 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55984296907 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544303797468 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.3342355547 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.25 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218004273774 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0934431410344 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.087939135471 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153976228925 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623423179314 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.