Farming which people tend to deal with, is the root of entire life in every country as it is connected with human life. Adults are able to acquire this field as well and they are appointed to do this profession by heart. However, there might be some hesitation to study this area among youngsters because it is a matter of exact facts of why they are likely disappointed and what can be done to avoid it.
Initially, one of the main reasons why most adults are willing to deal with this profession is dependent on not being interested in technology. Together with that, they are not keen on how to utilize modernized machines, gadgets or other types of electronic tools in the XXI century. In fact, huge and famed companies are manufacturing innovative and avant-garde computers and smartphones like Apple or Samsung. And it is clear that there are higher demands to live with these kinds of equipment than the field of farming among young aged people. Another reason of that is dependent on improvement of urban works which might include various professions in banks or other types of public affairs. Namely, there are plenty of modern professions for youngsters like computer engineer, freelancer, co-operator and so on. As these types of works are created, young people are used to studying in these fields except rural works.
To avoid this hesitation, youngsters should be able to live without technology in rural life. And there should be more aspiration in this area among them. Moreover, huge cities will have to be constructed in accordance with the rural areas which help improve the interest of farming among young aged groups.
In conclusion, youngsters ought to be able to acquire all fields respectively at the same time. It is so necessary to learn the field of farming which is the essential chain between the nature and human life.
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet newspapers will remain the main source for the majority of people To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Many people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of three spreads from 1981 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The bar chart below shows employment figures in different tourism related industries between 2009 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 57
- The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nted and what can be done to avoid it. Initially, one of the main reasons why m...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng in these fields except rural works. To avoid this hesitation, youngsters sho...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of farming among young aged groups. In conclusion, youngsters ought to be ab...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, well, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 13.1623246493 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87936507937 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62820716746 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536507936508 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8246807827 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.466666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274825198406 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889604683706 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874619941621 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17650400662 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115557711493 0.056905535591 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.