World is progressing alot in modern era due to the fact that most prominent descions which are made by authorities for further more devolpement. Directorate utilizes alot of capitals on plans to preserve fauna whereas there are several issues that are more significant than the mentioned above. A handful of masses contemplate that the bureaucracy use funds on schemes to save wildlife rather than to focus on other troubles. I strongly agree with the statement which this essay will discuss my view points further.
The first point to note is that authorities must concentrate on the highly demanding and life-changing factor which is education.It is necessary to provide kids with practical education than theoretical knowledge as they are responsible for overall all growth of nation.For instance directorate had recently changed the view of education in India which is step for further progress.Furthermore, lack of employement has been a really serious drawback in the path of success.Usually, it is seen that every month government introduce a variety of vacancy for solving muddle.
Moreover, pollution is one huge problem which the authorities should lay emphasis on. As, most of endanger species are suffer due to ill effect of pollution such as contaminating of water, emission of harmful gases and so on. As, a building is supported by its strong base. Similarly, pollution is related to base and building is reffered to extincting fauna. As in Antarctica the ice caps are being melt and having a look at some areas the ozone layer is being depleted which in turn lead to a variety of disease as UV rays enter from the spaces. Lastly, bureaucracy should be holding campaigns and events for improving the awareness of public.
To conclude, I strongly hold to view that authorities should use funds on other problem such as education, employement, pollution and campaigns for awareness rather than just concentrating on defending the species
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: than
...everal issues that are more significant than than the mentioned above. A handful of masse...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ogress. Furthermore, lack of employement has been a really serious drawback in th...
^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r solving muddle. Moreover, pollution is one huge problem which the authoritie...
^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'suffered'.
Suggestion: suffered
...sis on. As most of endanger species are suffer due to ill effect of pollution such as ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r, emission of harmful gases and so on. As a building is supported by its strong b...
^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...ilding is supported by its strong base. Similarly pollution is related to base and buildi...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, lastly, look, moreover, really, similarly, so, whereas, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15987460815 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89861710348 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58934169279 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1173373883 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.733333333 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.73333333333 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103139870535 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0327648802947 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346728182652 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693080250597 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381709115091 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.