Some people think the government should spend money on projects to protect wildlife while others believe that there are other problems that are more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The central government of a country is saddled with the responsibilities of handling financial and other affairs of the state. Although a few numbers of people are of the school of thought that they ought to be spending the money on the protection of wildlife, others argue that there are crucial issues; therefore, the money should be used to solve them instead. This essay will examine both viewpoints and give a balanced opinion.
On the one hand, some think that the government should allocate funds for the conservation of wild animals because of these compelling reasons. Firstly, they believe it reduces the chances of wildlife going extinct. Most wild animals such as dinosaurs, cape lions, and many others, have gone extinct; hence, preserving animals in a zoo is paramount for their continued survival and continuity. Secondly, protecting this wildlife could be beneficial for the country since zoos and game reserves are oftentimes used not only for educational purposes but also as amusement centres by the populace. These would undoubtedly result in the generation of revenue for the country through the admission fees collected.
On the other hand, others opine that the money should be allocated to solve other problems for these significant points. First and foremost, the health sector is in need of improvements. For example, in many Third World Countries where the health sector is in shambles and deteriorating fast, people feel spending the money on improving medical facilities, and purchasing good drugs would be much better. Furthermore, the money may be invested in reducing the rate of poverty most especially in developing countries. Poverty has led to an increased rate of crimes in those countries. So, investing such funds instead to upgrade the living conditions of people would help in curbing crime and making the society safe for people.
To sum up, even though some people believe that government should allocate money on the protection of wildlife so as to minimize them from extinction and for the benefits of the country, others argue that pressing issues such as health systems and alleviation of poverty of a country deserve more attention. In my opinion, both viewpoints are valid in their own rights. I think the government should budget the money based on the order of importance. If the basic infrastructure is the problem, then the biggest portion of the money should be used in that department. sector.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-01 | Arshdeep0900 | 84 | view |
| 2020-12-30 | naveensingh1000 | 78 | view |
- Some people feel that the media has the strongest impact on people’s lives. Others feel that it is politicians who have the most control over the way people lives. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion 73
- Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Air transport is increasingly used to export fruit and vegetables to countrieswhere they cannot be grown or are out of season.Do the benefits of this trend outweigh the drawbacks? 61
- Some people believe that all children should learn a foreign language from the time they start school, while others believe it is better to wait until a child is at secondary school. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. 73
- In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 588, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d rate of crimes in those countries. So, investing such funds instead to upgrade ...
^^
Line 13, column 112, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ate money on the protection of wildlife so as to minimize them from extinction and for t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 569, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Sector
...oney should be used in that department. sector.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, third, as to, for example, i think, such as, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2069.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19849246231 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77441095142 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540201005025 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 630.0 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1286079105 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.944444444 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301428556245 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883448347181 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776883367573 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199920339049 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925081610172 0.056905535591 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.