Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.
In today’s developed economic and industrial world, no one can deny the significant role of technology. Although technology has enhanced the welfare and comfort level of our lives, it can have pros and cons. In recent decades, many scientists have tried to analyze the effects of technology on children. Some people are proponents of the claim of many psychologists holding that technology today has made children less inventive than ever before; however, others stand at the opposite side of the viewpoint. I agree with the opinion that children today become more creative than ever thanks to technology. My viewpoint based on a few reasons, two compelling ones of which have been elaborated upon hereunder.
The first important point to bear in mind is that technology help children find readily any things they are willing to learn. Today, thanks to technology, easy access to a variety of scientific materials and resources can raise children’s interest in various sciences that can help open their mind. Indeed, access to technology is directly related to creativity, which means that technology leads to people to become more creative, and vice versa, creativity can develop this technology. Everyone in the world attests that access to the internet as a technology has had a fundamental impact on the world’s economic and industrial progress. As a result of this, it is crystal clear that today access to technology has made people more creative that has led to such developments all the world. For example, in a few past years many children as the future of society did not have access to the Internet as they today, almost all of them restricted to just their lesson books and did not learn new diverse sciences. That’s why today’s world is more progressive than ever because easy access to technology that makes people more creative is increasing.
Secondly, technology can help children learn new skills and improve them. We know that when the children’s skills in any field improve, it can help them to become more creative. Though there are several methodologies to improve children’s skills, the most important of them is technology. As a result of this, the use of technology is essential for more creativity. My own experience is a compelling example of what I mean. Five years ago, I bought a laptop for my seven-year-old son with some software installed on it. Thanks to this technology, he has reached a skill level that last month he created his own software. When I was at the same age, I did not do such creativity. Certainly, given the technology level being developed, the next generation will experience much more creativity.
In conclusion, I think today technology has enhanced children's creativity more than ever. Not only does the easy access to some technology fascinate children to learn new various sciences, but it also has improved their skills that help to more creativity.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-08 | nguyenthaian0127 | 90 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | yuktapradeep | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-09 | theprasad | 66 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | fanassertive | 71 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | weiwei | 70 | view |
- People benefit more from traveling in their own country than from traveling to foreign countries 76
- Nowadays children rely too much on the technology like computers smartphone video games for fun and entertainment playing simpler toys or playing outside with friends would be better for children s development 73
- Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends 76
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 70
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, i mean, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2453.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 481.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09979209979 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84367360484 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484407484407 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 765.0 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3903471088 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.208333333 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0416666667 20.6045352989 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54166666667 5.45110844103 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280733899122 0.236089414692 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0827572860216 0.076458572812 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724270938507 0.0737576698707 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186612580278 0.150856017488 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585051490764 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.