Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
If asked whether it is having a steady job and set a daily routine at work or hopping jobs that gives more career satisfaction, many would struggle to make a final decision. I am of oppion that while keeping jobs has its on advantages, there are numberous opportunities for pursuing a successful career that can obtain from switching jobs.
It is clear that there are several merits to hopping jobs. Firstly, by changing jobs from a company to another company or switching from a field to another field, people to have a plenty of chances to moving up the career ladder or to acquire experiences and skills in a new field that is the foundation for promotion opportunities in the future. For example, there is no many chance to move to a more significant position for everyone, even in some cases, relationship is an essential element to consider who deserve for promotion. Secondly, hopping jobs gives us a chance to maximise our salary as much as possible. This means that many of students who are just graduated applied to enterprises without dealing appropriate wage.
Not only that, but switching jobs has emotional advantages and numberous social benefits that is foundation for pursuing a successful career. To be specific, people are not able to completely know about working environment of a company without experiencing it. Studies have shown that bad mood from unsuitable working environment can generate a type of hormone that is reason of insignificant labor productivity. In addition, frequently changing jobs help us to communicate to many partners and build useful relationships with them that is extremely necessary for developing some kind of career. For instance, recruitment workers, especially head huters, really need a vast database that allow to access for searching suitable applicants. And one of the best way to create huge resources is hopping jobs and collecting data of labor workforce from businesses.
In conclusion, although having a steady job and staying in that zone maintain a stable statement and not get any risk of unemployment but I firmly agree that we should change the job that might bring us a plenty of chances to lift our career to peek of achievements and regconitions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-14 | huyen nguyen ngoc | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | PHẠM THẢO | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-05 | Blackcytrus | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | Blackcytrus | 78 | view |
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize he information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 67
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 370, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...es in the future. For example, there is no many chance to move to a more significa...
^^
Line 3, column 373, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun chance seems to be countable; consider using: 'many chances'.
Suggestion: many chances
...in the future. For example, there is no many chance to move to a more significant position ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 695, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'accessing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: accessing
... really need a vast database that allow to access for searching suitable applicants. And ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1860.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06811989101 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96782909932 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564032697548 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.7161161464 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.857142857 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2142857143 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212586236057 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067340253723 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435107578605 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136059815523 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122236001514 0.056905535591 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.