.In times of economic crisis, in which field do you think the government can cut financial support? 1) Art 2) Science research 3) Parks and public gardens
During the economic hardships, allocating funds to various programs equally is difficult because there are so many factors to consider. In reality, funding for certain areas has to get cut because the government cannot afford them all. If I were to decide, I will definitely give priorities to the support of art and science research.
To clarify, I am not saying that improving the condition of parks and public gardens is not important. On the contrary, their functions a lot in the city's beauty landscape and the quality of citizen’s life. However, if the government are on a limited budget, supporting art and science research can be better tools to boost the economy in the long run.
To begin with, investing art during the crisis can bring impetus to the recovery of the local and national economy. This is because of the facts that the arts and culture industry plays a pivotal role in government revenue. For instance, once I read a piece of news showing that in America, Arts and culture make of a larger share of the nation’s economy than transportation, tourism and agriculture. To the specific, arts can be the driving force for the development of local businesses. During the recession, people are suffering tremendous pressure of making a living and support their families, while arts and cultural events such as the theatre, standup comedies and musical performance are things that could make them laugh, release their pressure and comfort their soul. As a result, all the admissions and the cost of meals, retail, and lodging are vital to commerce for local businesses.
Furthermore, science research brings major changes and revolution in our society, which could in return help to break through the economic dilemma. To be specific, scientific research can lead to the innovation of the products and industry upgrading. With better goods, it can promote people to consume and even export to foreign countries. As a result, the government will witness a vast increase in national revenue, getting out the trouble of economy. What’s more, scientists and economists can do research of all the industries and consumers. Through the analysis of recent economic situation such as domestic consumption or annual export reports, the solution can be found. Therefore, without scientific research, the government isn’t able to go through the economic crisis, not to mention promoting financial improvement.
In conclusion, I strongly feel that the funding of infrastructure seems less important compared with art and science research in a limited budget during the economic crisis. This is because art and science research can bring new impetus to national and local business and serve as tools for economic recovery.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-14 | Mooooonica | 77 | view |
- 1 A city wants to help teachers of its high school students age14 18 improve their teaching It is considering two plans 1 Choose a small group of excellent teachers these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for additional training in how to teac 73
- 1 A city wants to help teachers of its high school students age14 18 improve their teaching It is considering two plans 1 Choose a small group of excellent teachers these teachers will attend a class led by an expert for additional training in how to teac 73
- In times of economic crisis in which field do you think the government can cut financial support 1 Art 2 Science research 3 Parks and public gardens 77
- 3 Which do you prefer An interesting and challenging job with less vacation or a job with more vacation time but less fun 85
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20135746606 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79741319199 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522624434389 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8215821914 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.476190476 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0476190476 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47619047619 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319391499466 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087137397019 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569477997226 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173190898892 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417732655208 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 13.8261648746 174% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 52.1666666667 113% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2299.0 1977.66487455 116% => OK
No of words: 442.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20135746606 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79741319199 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522624434389 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8215821914 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.476190476 100.406767564 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0476190476 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47619047619 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319391499466 0.236089414692 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087137397019 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569477997226 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173190898892 0.150856017488 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417732655208 0.0645574589148 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 10.9000537634 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 86.8835125448 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.