Some people think that people moving to a new country should accept the new culture in a foreign country. Others think that they should live as a separate minority group with different lifestyles. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Nowadays, more people are migrating to other countries than ever before. This raises questions about whether these immigrants should culturally assimilate into their host country or should stick to their traditional lifestyle and live as a separate minority group. From my point of view, immigrants should embrace new customs while maintaining their old traditions.
On the one hand, some argue that newcomers should adapt to the new culture of their adopted countries. First, they argue that adjustment to the new homeland is the key element to achieve success. To be more specific, by interacting and building good relationships with local residents, migrants can avoid unnecessary conflicts due to cultural differences. In addition, their willingness to adhere to the new culture will help them integrate into the new society more quickly than their reluctant counterparts, and they tend to have a better chance of success in finding work.
Yet others claim that immigrants should preserve their own traditions and customs and live as a separate group. First and foremost, by sticking together, they will not have a sense of alienation. Evidently, when coming to a new country, some can find it challenging to deal with the culture shock or language barrier. Therefore, they tend to congregate in particular areas. Moreover, by living in close-knit communities, they can communicate in the mother tongue, and whenever they are in trouble, they can explain their problem to someone who can easily understand them. Last but not least, some older migrants are reluctant to blindly adopt a new culture and forget about their cultural identity.
In conclusion, while adjusting to the customs and traditions of the new homeland is useful economically and socially, preserving one’s own national identity is more important for some migrants.
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- New parents should attend parenting courses to learn how to bring up their children well To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people say that mobile phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport Do you agree or disagree 78
- Many old buildings are protected by law because they are part of a nation s history However some people think old buildings should be knocked down to make way for new ones because people need houses and offices How important is it to maintain old build 78
- Some people think that charity organizations should only offer help to people of their own country But others believe that these organizations should give aid to people in great need wherever they live Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dealing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: dealing
...ation, newcomers could find challenging to deal with culture shock or race conflict. Th...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30716723549 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83629041638 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59385665529 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.102252836 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.666666667 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312928960636 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100338942448 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0521206450844 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190090012162 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683220319452 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.