In the days and ages, there is an increase in the number of criminals in many nations. While some argue that ensuring more police officers on the road is the most effective one, I opine that there are better solutions to tackle this issue.
There might be some certain reasons why the greater number of policemen create an impact on limiting criminality. First, the places with more unstable security status have the higher rate of offenders. Consequently, by rising the quantity of police, violated and law-breaking activities can be prohibited at the beginning. Furthermore, the increase in presence of the policemen on the streets would enable the residents to report whatever could be criminal signs or illegal activities. Therefore, the sooner they could intervene, the more detrimental impacts can be reduced.
However, the above-mentioned measure just only addresses the top of an iceberg, not the root of the problem. That is why crime education would be a more sustainable and efficient method to tackle the issue. Firstly, the education at an early age would have a positive influence on children’ lives. According to new studies, children who are rejected by their parents, grow up in dysfunctional families are at the highest risk of becoming delinquents. Additionally, teachers also play a vital role in raising the students’ awareness about crime. Not only moral lessons, but also optional subjects, like criminal psychology should be included in the study program to provide the knowledge and orientate them to become good citizens. Therefore, with the next well-educated generation, we could expect a minimized crime rates in the future.
In conclusion, although more defenders on the streets will bring the stable security status, I am firmly convinced that crime education will be a sustainable measure to remedy this issue.
- Society is based on rules and laws It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted to do To what extent do you agree or not 78
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 67
- Some people think that people moving to a new country should accept the new culture in a foreign country Others think that they should live as a separate minority group with different lifestyles Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Some people from poor and rural backgrounds find it difficult to get a university education Universities should make it easier for such groups to enrol To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore detrimental impacts can be reduced. However, the above-mentioned measure jus...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31972789116 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94058586214 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605442176871 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7322456644 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.266666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21009915337 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0663225115696 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0411517570322 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118846175935 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219444051226 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.