The graph provides information about the reasons why the businesses, varying in size, used social media, in the year 2012. The units are measured in percentages.
Overall, the highest proportion of businesses with all categories of employees made use of social media for developing business image or market products. Additionally, the businesses with over 1000 staff witnessed relatively higher rates for all the mentioned purposes of social media use as compared to the corporations with the rest number of employees.
In 2012, approximately 68% and 58% of companies having 1000+ employees used Internet to develop business image or market products and to obtain customer opinions respectively while the figures for these purposes in the remaining business categories ranged between around 20% and 55%, with the 10-49 and 250-249 workers companies being the lowest and the highest, respectively.
Turning to the collaboration with business partners and involving customers in development or innovations of goods or services, the rates were almost identical, ranging between 10% to around 30%.
There were more than 40% of businesses with 1000+ employees, more than 10% of all employees, between 10% and nearly 15% of 10-49 workers, slightly less than two fifth of those with 250-999 staff and just less than one fifth of those with 50-249 employees, respectively.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 61
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 78
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46698113208 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8859098108 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561320754717 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.9983673336 43.030603864 232% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 165.571428571 112.824112599 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2857142857 22.9334400587 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.85714285714 5.23603664747 35% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303375496321 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160183057207 0.103423049105 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124551076098 0.0843802449381 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175022050646 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115111902248 0.0819641961636 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.5 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 61.2550243902 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.04 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.