The pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013
The pie chart compares change the share of four major items namely, travel, film/music, books, clothes in the online shopping sales for retail sections in New Zealand from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, the shares of three items have experienced rises, there were declines in remaining two. Moreover, travel item contributed the largest portion whereas, clothes had the smallest share.
According to the given information, the share of travel item accounted for the most significant section in 2003. In contrast, the share of film and music sectors have experienced smaller to 12% rather than over a period of 10 years. The weakest share observed in books in 2003 at 19%. Lastly, contribution of clothes sector saw a significant and stood at 24%.
Turning to 2013, shopping sales of the clothes and travel shares dipped substantially by 8% and 7% respectively. However, the sector of books have been a gradual rocket to 22% over the 10 years. Both film and music portions could observe the highest share compared to other sectors. ( 33% )
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-19 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-14 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Hoàng Minh Hoàng | view | |
| 2023-09-26 | Trinh-tuan | 73 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | anhminhbnvn1 | view |
- The chart gives data about the number of students giving good ratings in 2000 2005 and 2010 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 73
- Many people feel that student should learn from online materials while others feel that it is better to use printed materials Discuss both view and give your own opinion 72
- Nowadays technological devices such as smart phones tablets bring more disadvantage than advantage Do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, lastly, moreover, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61989328608 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611764705882 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9424512963 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.7 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222148329194 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084159209295 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12294521479 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157585604775 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162534728284 0.0819641961636 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.