In the past, people have traveled abroad to see the many differences from their country. Nowadays, landscapes around the world are becoming more and more similar. What are the reasons for the similarities? Do you think the benefits of this equality outweigh the disadvantages?
With the advent of technology, travelling abroad gives individuals distinct opportunities to explore more regarding the world, however, the differences between all corners of world are getting smaller due to various reasons. I opine that the demerits of this trend outweigh its merits. The forthcoming paragraphs would vindicate my inclination.
The most prominent cause of these similarities is similitude in architecture caused by the assimilation for a long time. For instance, Vietnam, a South East Asian country, used to be a colony of China, France and America for number of years which attributes to existence of many French-styled buildings as well as Chinese styled. Moreover, globalization has led to exchanging idea and lifestyle of people. In present scenario, western culture is very popular among youngsters as they try to catch up western makeup styles, trending clothes and their life habitats. The appearance of cafe shops and restaurants have similar views as in rural areas as well as urban areas around the world. To demonstrate, KFC and McDonald's chains could be seen in most parts of world. Hence, these similarities are common due to exchanging of various ideas around the globe.
This trend has accomplished with various negative aspects. Initially, every nation has its own cultural identity which is our ancestor's most valuable legacy. This cultural globalization would destroy the cultural variations of each country. Furthermore, this mania will make global tourism pointless and boring as all the places are becoming the same, the tourists will loose the interest in visiting distinct countries and ultimately the economic growth will be affected because at present tourists are a booming industry which spur up the economy of the territory. Thus, the demerits are higher which could not be ignored.
To recapitulate, the incline in similarities globally is caused due to various factors which resultantly have various disadvantages rather than advantages.
- The table below gives the information about the percentage of workforce employed in six industries in Australia between 1989 and 2009
- The graph below shows the proportion of renewable energy of the total supply in 2000 2004 and 2007 90
- some people think it is more important to plant more trees in open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing to what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Nuclear energy is better Choices for meeting increasing demand To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- With the development of technology children are now living a world that is completely different to the past What problems does this cause for society and family 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...re becoming the same, the tourists will loose the interest in visiting distinct count...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4983713355 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9646346773 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622149837134 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.9104491397 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173951342959 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469913117308 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412330577775 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967015120987 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042963000413 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...re becoming the same, the tourists will loose the interest in visiting distinct count...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4983713355 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9646346773 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622149837134 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.9104491397 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1875 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173951342959 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469913117308 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412330577775 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967015120987 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042963000413 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.