The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today.
The provided map illustrates the changes that took place in Grange park since 1920.
Overall, it can be seen that the entire park has undergone numerous renovations, resulting in improved infrastructure and attractive amenities.
As is given on the map, the two main entrances via Arnold Avenue in the North and via Eldon street to the South remained unaltered. The central fountain has been supplanted by a beautiful rose garden with plenty of seating desks around it. Also, to its left, the stage for musicians along with seating desks has been knocked down in the favour of an Amphitheatre for concerts.
Further, seats and rose garden to the left of the South entrance have been destroyed, however, the rose garden to its opposite end remained untouched. To the left of the North entrance, a cafe and children's play area has been built to replace the rose garden and pond for water plants. A new water feature took over the area occupied by the glasshouse and a few seats in the Southeast corner of the park, with a new entrance for the underground car park to its opposite end.
- Whoever controls the media also controls opinions and attitudes of the people and there is little can be done to rectify this To what extend do you agree or disagree 78
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 73
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 73
- The chart below shows the total number of Olympic medals won by twelve different countries 78
- Essay on the topic of oil usage by four major consumers along with future predictions in a line chart 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8085106383 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59063850756 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574468085106 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7141080307 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0857888927948 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431446830223 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583534133142 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0724079217218 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531056965783 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.