In many countries, plastic containers have become more popular than ever. They are used in many businesses, for example, food and drink industries. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
These days, plastic-based containers have infiltrated a vast array of aspects of daily life, especially the food and soft drink industry. Although this brings certain merits facilitating a high-consumption society, I believe that the adverse impacts of massive plastic usage far surpass the benefits.
On the one hand, the major advantages of plastic containers are its versatility and cost-effectiveness. Firstly, plastic is durable and versatile, meaning that it can be shaped into diverse types of packages and allow the consistency of receptacles. This can be exemplified by the beverage industry which requires a variety of packages such as cup, bottle, and so forth. In this sector, only plastic can meet the enormous demand for drinking vessels. Secondly, plastic containers are highly economical for both manufacturers and consumers since the cost to produce them is relatively low. The prices of products, as a result, become more reasonable.
On the other hand, the use of plastic-based packaging inflicts tremendous damage on the environment and humans’ health. First and foremost, the consumption of plastic considerably increases in lockstep with the exponential extension of non-biodegradable waste, leading to the plastic pollution crisis. Moreover, the overuse of plastic products pose a threat to the marine ecosystem. Indeed, the microscopic particles of plastic debris in the soil can seep into the aquifers and float on the seas. Such elements can be eaten by aquatic animals and then disorder these creatures’ digestive function. Last but not least, burning plastic waste emanates poisonous fumes which lead to air contamination and induce human health implications.
In conclusion, inspite of the flexibility and cost-effectiveness of plastic containers, the downside of this material way outweighs the upsides in that plastic takes a heavy toll on not only the environment but also human beings. Therefore, it is imperative that we seek for better plastic management approaches and more environmentally friendly materials for packaging for the sake of more sustainable development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-19 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | nhattram39 | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-02 | Huang Mike | 84 | view |
| 2021-02-02 | Huang Mike | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-01 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
- In many countries plastic containers have become more popular than ever They are used in many businesses for example food and drink industries Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Most people try to balance between their work and other parts of their lives Unfortunately not many achieve this balance What are the reasons for this and what can be done to solve this 63
- Some people think that children should start school at a very early age but others believe that they should not go to school until they are older Discuss both view and give your opinion 80
- Some teachers think that international student exchange would be beneficial for all teenage school students Do you think its advantages will outweigh the disadvantages 75
- In many countries plastic containers have become more popular than ever They are used in many businesses for example food and drink industries Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66666666667 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31506802966 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619496855346 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4173829344 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.625 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188052449033 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0607834865994 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397371750434 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114177085669 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291059303469 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.