Nuclear energy is a better choice for meeting increasing demand.
Do you agree or disagree?
In this era of pace growth and development, we need reliable energy sources to meet rocketing electricity demand. In my opinion, nuclear power is indeed a relatively more appropriate choice, however, there are also potential dangers involved.
Nuclear energy can be preferred over traditional power generation because of several advantages. Firstly, it is a renewable source, unlike fossil fuels which are limited and hence should be used accordingly to avoid their depletion. Secondly, nuclear power is environmentally friendly, it doesn’t emit any carbon dioxide context in the atmosphere. Last but not least it does not require any suitable location for installation as it does not depend on factors like availability of required resources and also atomic energy’s mass to energy production is very high, which implies with small feedstock input of atomic content enough power can be produced to lighten the entire city.
However, it is undeniable that nuclear plants may be dangerous in some circumstances. The principal risks associated with nuclear power arise from radiation, which can penetrate deep inside the human body to damage biological cells and thereby initiate cancer. Furthermore, despite a great deal of energy produced from a nuclear powerplant, it requires large capital to develop a nuclear power station. Therefore, it is feasible to install and maintain it in some underprivileged nations. Moreover, the production of radiation could be taken advantage of by terrorism to proliferate nuclear weapons and pose a threat to world peace as it can cause a large-scale devastation.
In conclusion, atomic energy is the best solution to the energy deficiency that the world has facing right now. Also, it is the perfect solution to the environmental problems that we are facing right now. Though there are some disadvantages as well, so proper running and establishment of this kind of facilities should be guaranteed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
- the chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used internet everyday from 2003 2006 80
- Sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas 1999 2004 81
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The sales of three different kinds of books between 2002 to 2006 72
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46026490066 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04669052313 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612582781457 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5625200715 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.785714286 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148188234271 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499918502861 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042701784674 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0894001626731 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028313989916 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.