Dear Sir or Madam,
I am Mark Wood residing in Melbourne, Australia and I am writing to share my exhilarating experience with the ‘Little Italy restaurant near my house. I would want you to publish it in your ‘Sense and Dine’ column on Sundays so that it would be beneficial for others.
Last Friday was my daughter’s birthday and I wanted to celebrate it with my family in a good restaurant. So I took my family to ‘Little Italy’ restaurant. It was situated near the shores of ‘Park Avenue Beach’ and the surroundings were tranquil and picturesque. The dining hall was spacious, with very hospitable and conscientious staff.
We ordered traditional Italian cuisines like Pizza and Pasta, and I must admit that the food was of the highest quality and my whole family enjoyed having them. Even my 3-year-old kid loved the menus, especially the dessert which was exceptional. The service was quick. I would strongly recommend this hotel for anyone who are desperate to have a delicious Italian menu in Australia.
I have shared my experience with you so that other people in and around Melbourne might get to know that there is an excellent outlet in their community.
Thanks in advance.
Yours faithfully,
Mark Wood
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Many people believe that countries should produce food for all population eats and import food as little as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like them very much Why do people take part in dangerous sports Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers Give reason for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own k 78
- High job demands stress and sense of commitment are among the main reasons people go to work when they are ill This way they accomplish important tasks but may infect others or get some serious health problems themselves In your opinion should people go t 56
- Governments should be responsible for funding and controlling scientific research rather than private organizations To what extent you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 5.60731707317 571% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03381642512 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85160861345 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63768115942 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.289222674 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1538461538 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9230769231 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.153846153846 5.23603664747 3% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114175087498 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352348525229 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328967587957 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0716565170137 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368176784789 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.