Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Thanks to the proliferation of Internet innovation, there has existed a school of thought where people can acquire understandings of exotic aspects of culture around the world without transnational travel. I fully counter this point of view.
On the one hand, proponents of this have reasons to claim that virtual traveling also offers many benefits. To start with, the availability of tourist websites and travel blogs makes the web-users easily learn how foreign lead their life via Internet-connected mobile devices such as quality pictures, videos about foreign cultures, or bloggers’ experiences and views. Besides, due to the costly expense of traveling abroad, modest-income people could gain profound insights into overseas life without hands-on experiences by watching tons of images or reading interesting articles on the Internet.
On the other hand, I believe that the best way to have an understanding of other nations is to set your foot on it. Firstly, actual experiences are crucial for people to gain a deeper understanding of culture and provide them a more holistic view of distinct lifestyles and customs. For instance, a person cannot experience the festive atmosphere of a carnival or festival through pictures or videos. Secondly, information which is posted on blogs or Internet websites generally glamour because of advertising purposes, while the practical experiences would help people avoid falsely assume about the dark sides of a culture ranging from racism, gender discrimination to wealth gap,...etc.
To sum up, traveling through the Internet may bring several benefits, but I claim that people would be able to fully comprehend foreign nations through actual experiences(263 words)
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-20 | tung6.52611 | 78 | view |
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016
- The pie graphs below graph show the result of a survey of children s activities The first graph shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second graph shows the activities in which the girls participate 78
- Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 682, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...ism, gender discrimination to wealth gap,...etc. To sum up, traveling through t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, such as, to start with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56653992395 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04697283051 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657794676806 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.3088823762 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.4 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 7.06120827912 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18145765525 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662243291699 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330265818719 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106860007013 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230128834983 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.