The bar chart below shows the distribution of different income groups of men aged 25 44 in Sydney according to whether they were born in Australia or overseas

The allocation of different financial based on men group aged 25-44 in Sydney who born in Australia and overseas is revealed in the line graph.

Overall, the highest proportion between the men groups is the middle income who birth in their country. However, boys born in the outside region have the highest average earnings than those one.

Initially, the percentage of the adult men who born in Australia is around 14%, having small income with under $300. This cohort birth in the outside country is more slightly economy than that one, and it accounts for almost 23%. There are around 30% of males with the lower middle financial, if compared with those in overseas, this group is not as many profit as the latter bracket with 33%.

If looking at the middle earnings in native men, it shows around 35% having money between $600 and $1000, becoming the highest percentage of income. This group have more gainings than those in another country, at 27%. When it comes to boys who born in Both regions, around 20% and 15% with the highest income, over $1000, and this is the lowest percentage among by those cohorts.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun profit seems to be countable; consider using: 'many profits'.
Suggestion: many profits
...those in overseas, this group is not as many profit as the latter bracket, at 33%. If lo...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, nonetheless

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8112244898 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29100949142 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566326530612 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7761193568 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.777777778 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185510419814 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878285060357 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109362854197 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152886325176 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129311910278 0.0819641961636 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.