The charts show how university students spent their money in three countries in 2003.
Pie-charts illustrate university students' expenses on accommodation, food, books, leisure, and others in three countries for 2003.
Overall, country A's and B's students have a significantly larger budget than from country C. Another striking feature is half the budget is spent on essential items, such as accommodation and food, whereas the least amount on other needs, regardless of a country.
As for details, country C's students expenses make up almost a third of two other countries (1500 compared to 4500 and 5000, respectively). By contrast, the percentage of spendings on accommodation and food is approximately equal in all three countries and ranges from 62 to 67 percent. Moreover, the same pattern as in crucial items is observed in unimportant activities and comprise the following: 33 percent in country A, 38 percent in country B, and 34 percent in country C. Even though percentage patterns do not differ much in the listed countries, the real numbers will be significantly different as budgets of these three countries inconsistent.
- The garph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the UK Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make the comparisons where relevant 84
- Learning about the past has no value for those living in the present 90
- The graph show average CO2 emissions per person in the UK Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 61
- Due to low cost flights many people are choosing to holiday abroad rather than have holidays in their own country What are the advantages and disadvantages to this 61
- Diagram shows the development of the island 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, third, whereas, as for, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31927710843 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15516037873 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638554216867 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.0055952817 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.142857143 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7142857143 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 5.23603664747 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258247475066 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122124590851 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826475484544 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195646455195 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815537666831 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.2329268293 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.