The table below shows the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1,000 people in these countries in 2006.
The given table illustrates thousands of impermanent workers migrated to four different nations in two years of 2003 and 2006 and how many workers per 1000 people in these countries in 2006.
Overall, it is clear that United States had the highest number of temporary migrant employees in all the period. While New Zealand is the nation having the lowest volume of workers throughout the period. Moreover, New Zealand ranked the first position in the number of these workers per 1000 people in 2006, the opposite was true for United States.
In 2003, the number of temporary laborer in United States was 65.000 people, nearly 9 times higher compared to the figure for New Zealand, and fourfold to that of Australia and United Kingdom. In 2006, employing migrant workers in four nations were increased, around 87000, 266000, 219000 and 678000 people.
Meanwhile, New Zealand had the highest number of workers per 1000 people in 2006, at 21.1, nearly twofold to that of Australia. In the meantime, the figure for United States and United Kingdom only reached at 2.3 and 4.4 respectively.
- Bullying is a big problem in many schools What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 56
- Buying things on the Internet such as books air tickets and groceries is becoming more and more popular Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages 56
- The charts below give information on the location and types of dance classes young people in a town in Australia are currently attending Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 62
- The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02762430939 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41879184974 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524861878453 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7978264005 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.75 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413365568915 0.215688989381 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.175603785702 0.103423049105 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129371663085 0.0843802449381 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265526286809 0.15604864568 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107224946757 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.