Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job. on the other hand other people think that getting experiences and developing soft skills is more important . Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
While some people are in favour of higher education because it helps job hunting, others argue that real-life experiences are more important for the young. Both sides have good reasons but I incline to support the latter. I will analyze the advantages of both options and give my reasons why experiences are more plausible for the young.
Admittedly, university education can develop young in various ways. To begin with, it allows youngsters to concentrate on one specialisation. During a period of three or four years, students will learn in-depth about one subject and develop particular expertise. For instance, one can become a software engineer after pursuing a major in computer science. Secondly, university diplomas will be helpful in the labour market. Nowadays, it is ubiquitous for employers to ask for a college education regardless of the job type. Thus, a graduate certificate will be helpful in the process of job hunting.
Nevertheless, I believe that professional experiences are far more crucial and beneficial to the young. While university students focus only on academics and theories, young professionals will learn fast at a real job and acquire a lot of practical soft skills that they could not get from schooling. As an example, we will develop teamwork skills and leadership while collaborating with coworkers. These skills benefit the individual for a lifetime. Furthermore, there are also financial benefits. Youngsters will be compensated as soon as they enter the workforce. This will allow them to become independent and improve their standards of life without worrying about the loans that they might otherwise take if they chose to go to university.
In conclusion, a university education is useful if one wants to learn hard skills and become an expert in one area. But it will be more practical for most of us to get more real-world experiences, acquire more useful soft skills and to earn our lives earlier. For this reason, I encourage young people to consider entering the job market as early as they can.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-09 | Manvir singh | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the household expenditure in the two countries between 1980 and 2008 78
- Completing university education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job on the other hand other people think that getting experiences and developing soft skills is more important Discuss both sides and give your opinion 78
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status
- Although some countries with long working hours are economically successful this often had some negative consequences To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 601, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... helpful in the process of job hunting. Nevertheless, I believe that professiona...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 200, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to fast'
Suggestion: to fast
...heories, young professionals will learn fast at a real job and acquire a lot of prac...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1724.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17717717718 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91877988769 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561561561562 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9890922628 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.65 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238284627785 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670270833135 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565766827672 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156348231282 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594806982953 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.