The way students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic.
The author contends that according to the academics, students and scholars interpret the materials, don't they ? I strongly agree with the author's contention. Everyone has their own perception of the things they encounter in their life, and the perception is highly based on their academic backround. For the two reason, I strongly concede with the author's caim.
First of all, a person who is a physics scholar or a physics student, he has relatively different perception of the world than a student of religion or scholar of a religion. For the supporting example, a physics scholar sees the life as a cosmic output whereas a student in religion sees it as a gods' creation. One of of brother who was very curious about a cosmology once went to the class of religion and he shared with me that the religious pundit was interpretiong the planets and life as a God's creation, but later when he went to his university class of physics, he told me that his professor was interpreting the world as a result of bigbang. So, with respect to their own academia, they interpreted their knowledge.
Second of all, in mathematics if A=B=C, then students of mathematics could interpret it as A=C, however, a student or scholar of language views it as nonsense, he might say that they are three different alphabets of english and which were developed in Europe, he may tell us that from where these alphabets were came from. So, here we can clearly say that, a mathematics student construed it according to his academic experiences, nevertheless, the student of language has different interpretation.
Third of all, however, one might argue that, it is not true, a mathematician can interpret as the language scholar interpret. Of curse, he can interpret it if he works as a language expert, but untill unless he studies or works in language field, he interpretation always based on his academic backround and as his work experiences.
In sum, I strongly agree with the author's contention that the way students and scholars interpret the materials they work with in their academic because of the above two reasons.
- Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 60
- People today spend too much time on personal enjoyment doing things they like to do rather than doing things they should do 76
- Only through mistakes can there be discovery or progress 50
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
- In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standards by conserving resources and recycling materials Companies that receive 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...s and scholars interpret the materials, dont they ? I strongly agree with the author...
^^^^
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
..., dont they ? I strongly agree with the authors contention. Everyone has their own perc...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...different perception of the world than a student of religion or scholar of a reli...
^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sees the life as a cosmic output whereas a student in religion sees it as a gods ...
^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'gods'' or 'god's'?
Suggestion: gods'; god's
...eas a student in religion sees it as a gods creation. One of of brother who was ver...
^^^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: of
...eligion sees it as a gods creation. One of of brother who was very curious about a co...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'come'.
Suggestion: come
...us that from where these alphabets were came from. So, here we can clearly say that,...
^^^^
Line 9, column 35, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
.... In sum, I strongly agree with the authors contention that the way students and s...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rongly agree with the authors contention that the way students and scholars inter...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, then, third, whereas, as a result, first of all, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93539325843 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91359078987 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466292134831 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 532.8 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.9163622471 60.3974514979 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.153846154 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3846153846 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 5.21951772744 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.47096977043 0.243740707755 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180629841463 0.0831039109588 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147825291859 0.0758088955206 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.30296476339 0.150359130593 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.169582632404 0.0667264976115 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.