The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph illustrates the proportion of visitors in 4 different worldwide museums over the period from 1980 to 2015. Overall, it can be clearly seen that in all four museums the number of visitors widely fluctuated.
According to the graph, it is vividly shown that Vatican Museums had seen the most dramatic increase amongst all four museums from around 5 million to just over 9 million visitors in 35-year period. In 1980, Louvre had approximately 8 million visitors which was the most interesting amongst other museums. Moreover, there was an upward trend for the number of visitors for Louvre from 8 to nearly 9 million.
On the other hand, London Science Museum saw a gradual decrease in the proportion of visitors from 4 to nearly 2.1 million visitors over the period. Regarding Shenzhen Museum in the period between 1980 and 2015, the figures of visitors slightly fluctuated and ended almost at the same number of visitors as it was in 1980.
- The advantages of English spreading as a global language will continue outweigh the disadvantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 96
- The diagram below shows the production and processing of milk and dairy products for commercial sale Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The table below presents the number of children ever born to women aged 40-44 years in Australia for each year the information was collected since 1981. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where rel 73
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, regarding, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9263803681 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57113043849 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552147239264 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8705154347 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237803705213 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128784087821 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594419192254 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190331803868 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459031571227 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.