Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child’s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school.
Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion.
Almost any day of the week we can look at a newspaper and read an article about discussing the ways of children’s study, whether they should study at home or school. There are several points of view on this matter. The first claims that studying at home for children are considered beneficial in terms of children’s development due to the fact that they stay focused on studying, consequently they are not distracted by other kinds of activities. An alternative point regards studying at home without any other social activities and communicating with other children as harmful and considers attending school as the best option.
On the one hand, it is obvious that in recent years there have been a number of changes in the education system and it is possible to study by distance without attending school. This trend is becoming increasingly popular. It does not matter whether you like it or not you ought to recognize the fact that at home education children are protected from any other possible danger and parents have more time to spend with children. Moreover, nobody can deny the fact that it is exceedingly difficult to replace nurture by their parents.
However, this attitude may cause a number of concerns among people who believe that social activities are one of the main aspects of children’s development. It can be argued that lack of any interaction with other students may cause an introversion. Of crucial importance is how we define the matter in question. It is frequently said that when communicating with other children they obtain vital skills, such as working on a team, competition spirit.
From my point of view, the latter opinion makes sense definitely, as it follows from my own experience, as I studied at school. In any way, an attitude to this issue always depends on a particular person’s character and their personal background.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01277955272 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83620788495 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549520766773 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1512171166 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.071428571 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243317498881 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714454282032 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685962022258 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132032327133 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733179216737 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.