Convenience food will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional methods of food preparation
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In the recent world, people are big for the advantages of convenience food, some even state that this modern kind of food will certainly replace traditional dishes in the near future. This essay will compare the merits and drawbacks of the two while backing the idea that traditional courses can never been omitted.
The consumption of convenience food undergoes a dramatic rise recently due to the fact that people now lead a more hectic life. It is a widely method used to save time as no laborious preparation is required. Nevertheless, people indeed can never immerse themselves in any fast food like noodles or hamburgers at all because they always eat those in a hurry. Another reason for its attraction is the wide range of choices provided, fast foods like snacks take a new breath to their packaging really often, in addition to a large amount of chemicals included the products to ensure that they remain long and serve for their every customers’tastes. Therefore, when carefully considered, eating too much fast foods can also cause enormous health related effect in the long run.
Mean while, it is undeniable that traditional food brings us much more advantages, especially in the cultural aspect. Pho of Vietnam or curry of India are symbols of their own countries, and tourism also depends on this long tradition to lay the foundation for its industry. On account of that, I believe that culture-sharing will no longer exist and a country will lose not only one of its unique features but also a strong economic backup if it citizens get rid of their own dishes to pursue such a product of advanced society. Along with that, more affection will be developed in the world if people cook and eat food altogether, it serves for their mental fuction as well as their children cognitive developments.
In conclusion, traditional food can never be replaced no matter how much the new advancement may bring. People should keep preserving it for the sack of their own countries, their cultures and for themselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-21 | milliencechartles | 89 | view |
- There are many different types of music in the world today Why do we need music Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays 70
- Convenience food will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional methods of food preparation To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- The internet has transformed the way information is shared and consumed but it has also created problems that did not exist before What are the most serious problems associated with the internet and what solutions can you suggest 89
- Even though governments have worked hard to bring about improvements in the health care system the overall standard of physical health in developed countries is decreasing What are the potential reasons for this and what are some of the long term effects 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the recent world, people are big for the advantages of convenience food, some eve...
^^
Line 2, column 134, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('widely') instead an adjective, or a noun ('method') instead of another adjective.
...ople now lead a more hectic life. It is a widely method used to save time as no laborious prepa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: MEAN_WHILE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'meanwhile'?
Suggestion: Meanwhile
...health related effect in the long run. Mean while, it is undeniable that traditional food...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, therefore, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94721407625 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79086149856 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604105571848 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.2918590234 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.769230769 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2307692308 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20290297394 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790157289728 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558106942135 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136235313596 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0567615178379 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.