The four given pie charts illustrate how electricity was produced by 3 different sources in India, Sweden, Morocco, and Vietnam in 2003. Overall, fossil fuel was used the most in generating electricity in Vietnam and India while it is hydropower in Sweden and Morocco.
According to the first and fourth chart, in 2003, Indian and Vietnamese exploited fossil fuel sources for electric production, which account for 82% and 56% respectively. At the same time, hydropower was also the second main sources in the Vietnamese electric industry (at 44%) whilst it accounted for only 14% in India. It is nuclear power which was a minor source in electric production in India.
Turning to the two left charts, Hydropower accounted for the highest proportion in both Sweden and Morocco at 52% and 95% respectively. Meanwhile, in Sweden, nuclear power played a significant role in electric producing in Sweden with 44% usage. By contrast, fossil fuel was not popular in both the Swedish and Moroccan electric industry.
- The charts below give information about world s spending world s population and consumption of resources Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honeybee
- The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled PMT by transportation type in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...India Sweden Morocco and Vietnam in 2003 Overall fossil fuel was used the most in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98780487805 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74281821397 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512195121951 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 164.0 22.4926829268 729% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 818.0 112.824112599 725% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 164.0 22.9334400587 715% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 34.0 5.23603664747 649% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148665495622 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148665495622 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108583878631 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268294140506 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 84.1 13.2329268293 636% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -86.52 61.2550243902 -141% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 66.1 10.3012195122 642% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.85 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 14.95 8.06136585366 185% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 11.4329268293 499% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 67.6 10.9970731707 615% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.