Directors of large organizations earn much higher salaries than ordinary employees. Some people think it is necessary, but others are of opinion that is unfair. Discuss both view and give your own opinion
Nowadays, the number of companies, organizations founded is as much as mushroom after rain. Though each particular entity has its own criteria for recruiting personnel, the similitude is once you reach a higher position, it follows upsurge in salary. Some people advocate their support while others hold different notion.
To start with, it stands to reason that the more you contributr to organization's development, the more your income become. Directors hold important role as they are the people who have to regulate, analyse and put forward future strategy for the company. These are avalanche of work. If employees clamour to work hard then they should give a second thought on how consiencious the managers work to bring them those assignments. Furthermore, executives hold more responsibility than their subordinate when it comes to legislation. I can cite a small coffe shop to vindicate my points. Managers will need to deal with hiring estates, facility, working with local authorities for legal permissions.... While the mission can constitute errand compared to those.
On the other hands, skeptics have their sounding reasons against disparing money unequally. They claim their tasks to be more time-consuming and labour-intensed. Not to mention, they occasionally have to work night shift, which somehow has a negative impact on their personal life. Therefore, it is essential to pay equally to compensate their blood, sweet and tears.
From my own perspective, giving directors higher salaries is of necessary need given that high salary tantamounting to triumph in workplace. Also, creating hierachy of salariea put forth employees to strive more, contribute more and climb more rungs on the ladder to success.
In conclusion, I think we should still sustain recent systems that give more money to executives.
- Some people argue holding sporting events is beneficial to a country s development Other people hold the opposite opinion Discuss both view and give your own opinion 84
- The maps below shows the town of Lynnfield in 1936 and then later in 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The diagram shows the water consumption and residential water usage in Australia in 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting key features and make comparison where relevant
- Some believe that people should make efforts to fight climate change while others think it is better to learn to live with it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 65
- Students perform better in school when they are rewared rather than punished To what extent do you agree Discuss both view and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e company. These are avalanche of work. If employees clamour to work hard then the...
^^
Line 3, column 700, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...l authorities for legal permissions.... While the mission can constitute errand compa...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, second, so, still, then, therefore, while, i think, in conclusion, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44912280702 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99589541716 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673684210526 0.561755894193 120% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4682713288 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.2777777778 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05555555556 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150606490962 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0401147349943 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492110755835 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824372990469 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475317868556 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.