The diagram below shows the carbon cycle.
The process diagram illustrates the cycle of carbon that’s present in abundance in our atmosphere.
Overall, the carbon cycle is composed of two smaller sub-cycles. The first one involves uptake by plants and animals which eventually leads to release of carbon into atmosphere again. The other one involves carbon consumption by ocean that is ultimately converted into limestone and shells.
So in the first sub-cycle, the carbon dioxide in the air can be taken up by either animals or plants. If it’s taken up by the animals via consumption of plants, it can either be released back into atmosphere due to respiration or animals can decompose. On the other hand, if the uptake is by the plants through photosynthesis, it can either by consumed by animals, as mentioned earlier, or it can also decompose like animals.
Once decomposed, these can turn into fossils through a process known as fossilization. These fossils are then dug up later in the form of oil, coal and gas. After extraction and processing, it can be used for different purposes such as to run cars that use combustion engines. These cars then pollute the air with carbon dioxide and carbon once again reaches the atmosphere. The second sub-cycle involves carbon consumption by the ocean which can convert it into limestone and shells through a process called sedimentation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view | |
| 2024-11-02 | Giang Tran | view |
- The charts below show changes in international student numbers 73
- The tables below show the reasons for travelling and the main issues for the travelling public 78
- The charts below show total British exports and the countries that Britain exports to 52
- More cars and traffic on the road This causes traffic jams and excessive pollution People suggest that one way to solve this issue is to increase the price of fuel 84
- Behavior in schools is getting worse Explain the causes of this problem and suggest some possible solutions 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, then, as to, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11711711712 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86273931007 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522522522523 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5224787519 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6666666667 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168258167457 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789976149435 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894354893569 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145933222316 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0985954106682 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.