more and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes, car, and other items. What the reasons? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
It is clear that famous brands have an impressive attraction for numerous people. They willingly pay much money to own high-luxury cars, flashy clothes, watches. This phenomenon can be explained by the quality of products as well as the psychology of customers. From my perspective, people's appetites for owning lavish items have adverse effects on society.
We are going to consider what causes famous brand's desire. Firstly, famous brands create a good perception of quality. The customer believed that famous brands always supply excellent quality, unique-designed, trendy products, and especially each of these has been made of high-skilled artisans. All of the elements above could make well-known brand's things more different and desirable than comparable ones. Secondly, psychology has an enormous effect on the decision-making behavior of buyers. What is different between Targer handbag and Hermes one? One thing is easy to notice that it is the name. The brand names make customers thought these could reflect the personality and status in society. For example, wearing a Louis Vuitton coach could make people think that we come from wealthy families. This tricky psychology promotes people to follow high-fashion brands.
This trend is a negative development. On the individual side, it is costly. Some people purchase famous brands not because they need it but because it is trendy. If this tendency happens for a long time, it will cause debt and financial burden. For instance, the high rates of consumer debt in America are increasing day by day. Furthermore, debt and financial burden, which this trend has caused, will harm the nation's development. Especially in developing areas, young people who could not pay the debt or get through the desire of luxury things will turn into crime. It leads to a detrimental impact on social security.
To sum up, to become intelligent customers, we should consider both benefits and drawbacks which the consumption of well-known goods will cause.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-03 | lenanguyen 0710 | 84 | view |
- 11 Government should invest on teaching science subject rather than other subjects for country to develop and prgress To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries Why is this the case Is it a positive development 73
- 1 Many criminals re offend after they have been punished Why do some people continue to commit crimes after being punished and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem 70
- in most countries fast food is becoming cheaper and more available Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 59
- An increased number of people today change their career and living places in their life is it a positive or negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tems have adverse effects on society. We are going to consider what causes fam...
^^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...has been made of high-skilled artisans. All of the elements above could make well-known br...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people to follow high-fashion brands. This trend is a negative development. On...
^^^^
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ch this trend has caused, will harm the nations development. Especially in developing a...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...detrimental impact on social security. To sum up, to become intelligent custome...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34384858044 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79776759361 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630914826498 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4662880906 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.652173913 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.7826086957 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95652173913 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146753222818 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386650673631 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396967213572 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.069327810001 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520887860266 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.1 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.