The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
The given bar chart illustrates the percentage of residents’ coffee and tea purchasing and consuming habits in last 4 weeks in five different cities (Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide, and Hobart) in Australia.
In general, it is evident that going to a cafe to have coffee or tea was the most common habit, except in Adelaide. Additionally, the percentage of people buying instant coffee was always higher than that of those purchasing fresh coffee in all cities.
In terms of Sydney and Melbourne, while the percentage of Sydney’s people drinking tea or coffee at a cafe was about 61%, the figure for Melbourne was slightly higher, at around 63%. Meanwhile, above 45% of citizens in Sydney and Melbourne had a habit of buying instant coffee, whereas the proportions of those purchasing fresh coffee in these two cities were around 44% and 43% respectively.
Moving on to the remaining cities, having coffee or tea at a cafe accounted for the largest percentage of people in Hobart, followed by Brisbane and Adelaide, at approximately 51% and 49% respectively. At the same time, around 53% of people in Brisbane and Hobart chose to buy instant coffee, compared to nearly 50% of those in Adelaide. Finally, a close similarity can be seen in the percentage of people buying fresh coffee in Brisbane and Adelaide, at around 34%, while Hobart’s figure was higher, at roughly 38%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-08 | deepak krishnamurthy | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-12 | phuongphuong | 78 | view |
| 2021-03-25 | rpdesai90 | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-23 | Phạm Hoàng Trung | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 78
- The bar chart below give information about five countries spending habits of shopping on consumer goods in 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the average number of Vietnamese students study in France Russia and America between 2000 and 2015 81
- The graph below shows the average number of Vietnamese students study in France Russia and America between 2000 and 2015 73
- The graph below shows the number of passenger railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004 5 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 5.05154639175 257% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 26.3917525773 178% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.85567010309 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 937.175257732 124% => OK
No of words: 230.0 206.0 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06086956522 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82687614399 2.54303337028 111% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 127.690721649 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508695652174 0.622605031667 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 357.3 290.88556701 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 1.44329896907 693% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 16.3608247423 171% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.5237596546 44.8134815571 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.5 76.5299724578 190% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.75 16.8248392259 171% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 4.34317383033 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239128978167 0.216113520407 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119455618462 0.0766984524023 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039425737435 0.0603063233224 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16704967081 0.12726935374 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346853276696 0.0580467560999 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 8.37731958763 201% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 70.7449484536 61% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 7.45979381443 190% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 8.71597938144 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 41.2886597938 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 8.54432989691 154% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.