The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United States, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967and 2007
The line graph illustrates carbon dioxide emissions by the person in four countries from 1967 to 2007.
Overall, the average Co2 emissions per person were major in the United States, Sweden almost at the top in 1977. Whereas, another two countries were augmented year by year. But Sweden and Portugal were similar in 2007.
First of all, in the year 1967 maximum Co2 emissions by human beings were in the United States and Sweden, was respectively 11 and 8.1 metric tonnes. After a decade Sweden was across the 10 metric tonnes and the United States alleviated slightly. In 1987 United States was below the 10 metric tonnes. Whereas, Sweden fall dramatically it was almost touched 6 metric tonnes in 1997. In another 10 years, both were sharply decreased the United States at started point of Sweden, Sweden was connected to Portugal.
Secondly, Italy was above 4 metric tonnes for the Co2 emissions in the year of 1967. At the same time Portugal below 2 metric tonnes, in another 10 years, Italy growth was significantly where Portugal augmented a little bit. But both countries pic points came in 1997 at that time both increased. Italy reached near to 8 metric tonnes and Portugal was 6 metric tonnes. In the last 10 years, those countries were steady.
- The pie chart shows the online shopping sale for retailer sector in New Zeland in 2003 and 2013 10
- Some people say that the main environment problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plan and animals Other say that there are more important environment problem 61
- These days in many countries fewer and fewer people want to become teaches particularly in secondary schools What are the reasons for this and how could the problem be solved 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of the whole population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 with projection till 2050 73
- The column graph shows the percentage of males in a particular country who prefer watching sport to males who prefer participating in sport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main future and making comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ates, Sweden almost at the top in 1977. Whereas, another two countries were augmented y...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... States was below the 10 metric tonnes. Whereas, Sweden fall dramatically it was almost...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 214, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ignificantly where Portugal augmented a little bit. But both countries pic points came in ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...rtugal augmented a little bit. But both countries pic points came in 1997 at that time bo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1050.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88372093023 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41567801464 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483720930233 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4824128238 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.0 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3571428571 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21428571429 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281817649987 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111354850371 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825809398902 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194630604379 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059011339595 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.