Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology

Essay topics:

Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.

Overall, In today's era majority, people are depended on technology. That why they targeted theire social life that a reason they have a loss to interact with another person.

Hence, we discuss both points of view every technology have there own pros and cons. But technology gives us so many things like they provide an internet, electrical gadget. Nowadays, internet succour a lot like technology makes the world small because of everything are available on the internet such as essential products and all types of news, entertainment programs. Which can help people to a better understanding and give some general knowledge. That way they feel like they have everything. Maximum time has spent on technology.

On other hand, their social life has taken some limitation. People don't have some time to interact with others. They have some cons like spending much time on technology so they are affected by this. They forgetting the value of the relationship. Nowadays, the growth of technology has incredible. Their graph has been augmenting vastly after a decade. It has to attract the person and people are emulated.

I deem that, both views have their importance. But I believe the use of technology is on shorten level you can use it for your work regarding. And other free time you should be talking to your family members or friends. Spend your time in both directions.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-15 heroprox1 56 view
2023-10-13 MinyiChu 61 view
2023-08-17 hau le 84 view
2023-08-05 Kiwi 89 view
2023-07-05 phamtrucmaiphuong 78 view
Essays by user bhatt95 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: THERE_OWN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'their own'?
Suggestion: their own
...th points of view every technology have there own pros and cons. But technology gives us ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... life has taken some limitation. People dont have some time to interact with others....
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, regarding, so, as to, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1155.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 230.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02173913043 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67255532868 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613043478261 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.2975951904 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6648759917 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 60.7894736842 106.682146367 57% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.1052631579 20.7667163134 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.36842105263 7.06120827912 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188350794433 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527843778998 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045017934095 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108047858497 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390848860543 0.056905535591 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.0946893788 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 50.2224549098 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.95 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 78.4519038076 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.1190380762 67% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.