There is not any escape from the fact that both print or electronic media are dominant in many aspects of our life irrespective of age and place. It is worth discussing the impact of media how its widespread existence is benefiting and harming the masses around the globe. Both the elements are explained in the ensuing paragraphs.
Taking the brighter side into consideration first, media can be mainly categorized in two segments - education and entertainment. The most common mediums are TV, Radio, Internet, Newspaper and books which make a huge volume of valuable information and learning available to the people. For example, a student can access hundreds of youtube channels for a subject(science and maths) and the option of buying and reading bestselling books or magazines on any topic is always open. Apart from this, entertainment, which is also a primary need today, is catered to overwhelmingly through every form of media. If we talk about music and movies only, then a large number of TV and radio channels exist alongside new OTT platforms such as Netflix, Amazon Prime, YouTube and ganna.com etc. Which are easily accessible on smartphones and computers. Social networking apps, in addition, not only connect people for fun but also for educational and business purposes.
However, excess of everything is bad; the dominance of media has given rise to some serious problems. All the content people read, listen or see deeply engage and overpower their mind. For instance, it seems hard for a student to concentrate on studies after watching suspense thriller movies or nail-biting live tournaments. Moreover, online games are so addictive that people especially a teenager waste lots of precious time on them despite their severe consequence. Blue whale is the best illustration of the worst impact a mobile game can leave on the mind. In other words, media is serving anything regardless of quality in the name of entertainment and information because it is a prolific business. Indirectly, low individual performance, aggressive behaviour and social disharmony are the clear attributions of irresponsible media.
In conclusion, not everything is rational and good for people which is being provided to them through multiple mediums. It depends on individuals, whether they drawing the advantages or becoming a victim of inappropriate virtual data.
- The given graph shows the consumption of fast food in the UK per week from 1970 to 1990 87
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- The bar chart below shows the sector contribution to India s gross domestic product from 1960to 2000 11
- Some people think it is more important to plant more tree in open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing To what extend do you agree or disagree 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 649, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... talk about music and movies only, then a large number of TV and radio channels exist alongside n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vided to them through multiple mediums. It depends on individuals, whether they ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 376.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32446808511 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00306724039 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646276595745 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9461036076 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.368421053 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7894736842 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42105263158 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134187161529 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034876196615 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0395153801041 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792256566208 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412292560899 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.