The given line graph illustrates the information of population density, rate of birth and mortality rate for a period of three centuries starting with 1700 for England and Wales.
Overall, it can be clear from the chart that, although an oscillated trend created by the birth and death rate, consistent increase was observed in the population (except a stability in 1750 and 1800).
With regards of population, in 1700, about 2.5 million people lived in both the mentioned countries. After a linear rise of 7.5 million, this value surged to 10 million till 1750. Till 1800, unchanged state was observed and next to this steadyness, with a rapid climb the figure jumped at just near the 50 million people at the end of duration.
Looking at the birth rate and death rate, the former began with exact 30000 person, while latter started by approximately 27.50 thousand. After a rise of 10000 by the year 1750, both leveled-off till 1800. After that, death rate decreased minimally and setled down at 20000 people in 2000. In contrast, with a frequent fluctuation the amount of new born infant fell down to near 21 thousand people in 1950 and immidiate after that a sharp upsurge was observed in final year with the scale of around 34 thousand birth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...end created by the birth and death rate, consistent increase was observed in the ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 77, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'person' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'people', 'persons'.
Suggestion: people; persons
...rate, the former began with exact 30000 person, while latter started by approximately ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 518, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the scale of around 34 thousand birth.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83177570093 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48336240382 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598130841121 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1764845242 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.888888889 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186354064245 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.080912008158 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089353089181 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133980015312 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921515538282 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.