Many people believe that some buildings designed and constructed lots of years ago are not useful anymore. It is beneficial to demolish them to build new ones instead. I mostly disagree with this point of view, because I think to keep this old building can value-added to the communities than replacing them.
Firstly, old constructions have an important commercial value as they are an enormously important attraction for tourism. For instance, some old buildings with historical value after refurbishing can be famous landmarks to attract tourists to understand the culture. Furthermore, some of these buildings have witnessed the landmark events of a city, people who visit the buildings can understand how the past events have an impact on the city. Future generations can not remember the history If the old buildings were knocked down.
On the other hand, it is true that some aged constructions should be destroyed, giving way for modern news. Specifically, outdated buildings were designed and installed with less advanced material and architectural technologies than modern ones. They could change the materials with time past, causing problems of safety. For instance, there were plenty of houses over thirty years exit which collapsed when the 921 earthquakes in Taiwan. Thus, there have strict rules for construct buildings in case of damage from earthquakes and happening some things the same again.
In conclusion, I believe that only the old building which may lead to problems on safety should be removed, others building with cultural and traditional values should be maintained to keep the historical knowledge.
- Some people think young people are not suitable for important positions in the government while other people think it is a good idea for young people to take on these positions Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to the modern buildings To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to the modern buildings To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, for instance, i think, in conclusion, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40234375 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85636100971 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60546875 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6112768595 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.384615385 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305311730534 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106857243148 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708283315245 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187105587943 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314832167935 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.