Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious problems, as well as practical problems.
To what extend do you agree or disgree with this statement?
It is commonly believed that speaking second language beside mother tounge in a country can result in various benefits. However, I firmly believe that using more than one language in a country can lead to misunderstand and communication in conservations and the disappearance sliently of that country's national language.And this essay will adress the reasons for may view as follow.
To begin with, a great deal of advocates are inclined towards the fact that speaking a foreign language makes both speakers and listeners misunderstand and miscommunicate. This is due to the fact that citizens can be limited in approaching foreign language. In other words, people who live in rural or isolated areas do not have a chance to learn a new language sufficiently without any challenges so people cannot be in the same level of second language. As a result, communication becomes much less effectively as big as the language gap is.
On top of that, one country's mother tongue can be likely to disappear in some day. This is because of exceed using of foreign language among the residents. People enjoy showing their high level of proficiency in a foreign language with the others so they do not tend to use foreign language instead of their mother tongue. In a long term, they may loose traditional and cultural values attached to their first language themselves.
In conclusion, ineffective communication and loosing a mother tongue are the outcomes of using ignorantlya foreign laguage in one country. For these reasons, it is clear that heritage of a community could be collapse if there is lack of balanced language usage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-31 | truongthiloc | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-05 | alice112 | 61 | view |
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious problems as well as practical problems To what extend do you agree or disgree with this statement 61
- The line grah shows thiefs per thousand vehicles in four European countries between 1990 and 1999
- The line grah shows thiefs per thousand vehicles in four European countries between 1990 and 1999
- The line grah shows thiefs per thousand vehicles in four European countries between 1990 and 1999
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... second language beside mother tounge in a country can result in various benefits...
^^
Line 1, column 322, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: And
...ntly of that countrys national language.And this essay will adress the reasons for ...
^^^
Line 1, column 374, Rule ID: AS_FOLLOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'as follows'?
Suggestion: as follows
...ay will adress the reasons for may view as follow. To begin with, a great deal of advoca...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...mother tongue. In a long term, they may loose traditional and cultural values attache...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0671641791 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95959273026 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570895522388 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9976208324 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.166666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199598603338 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755613338956 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0374635657675 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117714327233 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458283477288 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.