Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It goes without saying that in this progressive and sophisticated world, where we are living, group projects and assignments are one of the most important of our educational or professional lives. There has been a controversial debate as to whether communicating personal for handing a project is more beneficial than discussing in person. From my perspective, communicating through social networks or other platforms like Gmail is not practical, and two reasons to support my viewpoint are elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, communicating in person, the members of a group will not misunderstand important principles and concepts. It is not a secret to anyone that although sending emails or discuss through a topic by using social media is convenient, it has a lot of downsides and it is more likely that people misunderstand some concepts and plans, which is prevent the group from reaching its goal. For escaping from the clutches of such a problem, all members of the group should communicate in person. To put it in more vivid picture, when I was a university student, my friends and I had an significantly important project, which should have been done by the collaboration of all members; at first we decided to send our data and recommendation methods online using email; unfortunately, some of the members misunderstood the right data for experiment and they did their contribution wrong, which took us a lot of time to restore the project. Had we communicated in person, we would not have lost such a precise time. as you can see, the advantages of meeting outweigh its disadvantages.
Furthermore, doing this, meeting each other in person rather than discusses through sending emails, people are more likely to hand in a great project. It is crystal clear that when we communicate and talk in person we are able to hear other members' opinions and suggestions simultaneously, meaning the best idea and method for handing the project in will be chosen. Discussing over a topic by having a meeting, all members can participate and state their novel ideas and notions and then other are able to assess the priority and the advantages of each notion; therefore, the best decisions could be made through such a situation. No longer will people on the group will be overwhelmed with stress since they are sure they can make the best decisions by doing so, talking in person and sharing ideas.
In sum, having aforementioned reasons and examples into account, meeting each other is more helpful. Not only will they be able to make the best decisions and be successful, they will also, understand important concepts deeply.
- It is better to have friend who are intelligent than to have friend who have a good sense of humor 70
- Nowadays people are too obsessed with buying and acquiring material things such as expensive clothes because they think that people around them will judge them based on what they possess 64
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Providing Internet access is just as important as other services such as building roads so governments should offer Internet access to all of their citizens at no cost Use specific reasons and examples 71
- Nowadays people are more willing to help people they don t know for example by giving clothing and food to people who need them than they were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer Be sure to use your own words Do not use me 76
- It is important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to you 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
.... There has been a controversial debate as to whether communicating personal for handing a pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'prevented'.
Suggestion: prevented
...stand some concepts and plans, which is prevent the group from reaching its goal. For e...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...niversity student, my friends and I had an significantly important project, which ...
^^
Line 3, column 786, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...hods online using email; unfortunately, some of the members misunderstood the right data fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1016, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...ould not have lost such a precise time. as you can see, the advantages of meeting ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, then, therefore, as to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2221.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 437.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0823798627 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00334335707 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508009153318 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.7842419571 48.9658058833 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.066666667 100.406767564 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1333333333 20.6045352989 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 5.45110844103 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212895300217 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784989156596 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456605407087 0.0737576698707 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133587663177 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018950639968 0.0645574589148 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 11.7677419355 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.01818996416 112% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.