The line graph illustrates three different ways to enquire, which the Tourist Information Office received in a particular city over a period of six months in 2011.
Overall, it is clear that the number of requirements through phone and meet in person experienced an upward trend during the time frame while the opposite was true for those enquiries received by letters or emails.
In January, the number of enquiries was sent to the Tourist Information Office through telephone was about 900 while the figure for inquiries received in person was lower, at around 400. Then, this number rose steadily to 800 in March and had a rapid increase of approximately 800 before reached a peak of around 1900 enquiries in June. A similar trend was witnessed in the number of requests received through phone calls fluctuated from January to March, then remained at a similar level in one month before rocketed to roughly 1600 in June.
In the first month of 2011, the Tourist Information Office received about 800 enquiries. However, this figure eventually plunged by roughly 400 in June.
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life Is it a positive or negative development 89
- Recent research has shown that business meetings and training are increasingly taking place online What are the advantages and disadvantages of this 69
- As parts of education students should spend a period of time living in another country to learn its language and culture To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The table below shows information about age average income per person and population below proverty line in three states in USA 78
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ice received in a particular city over a period of six months in 2011. Overall...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 909.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61922498197 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572222222222 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4194033387 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.857142857 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7142857143 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364301348708 0.215688989381 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170072223971 0.103423049105 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152083330418 0.0843802449381 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235200242467 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141413870726 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.