NOWADAYS THE WAY MANY PEOPLE INTERACT WITH EACH OTHER HAS CHANGED BECAUSE OF TECHNOLOGY IN WHAT WAYS HAS TECHNOLOGY AFFECTED THE TYPES OF RELATIONSHIPS POEPLE MAKE HAS THIS BECOME A POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE DEVELOPMENT

Essay topics:

NOWADAYS THE WAY MANY PEOPLE INTERACT WITH EACH OTHER HAS CHANGED BECAUSE OF TECHNOLOGY.
IN WHAT WAYS HAS TECHNOLOGY AFFECTED THE TYPES OF RELATIONSHIPS POEPLE MAKE ?
HAS THIS BECOME A POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE DEVELOPMENT

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-15 heroprox1 56 view
2023-10-13 MinyiChu 61 view
2023-08-17 hau le 84 view
2023-08-05 Kiwi 89 view
2023-07-05 phamtrucmaiphuong 78 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 229, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... particular destination to meet and talk . Also, if they were in a long distance r...
^^
Line 6, column 499, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d it makes their relationship more tight . Not only the convenience but also the i...
^^
Line 6, column 716, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...t lost her parents in 2015. Then a kind women found her and decided to post her pictu...
^^^^^
Line 12, column 124, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'development'?
Suggestion: development
...more tight and it has become a positive developments.
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, then, thus, as to, in conclusion, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06603773585 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04461454611 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540880503145 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.375062406 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.0434782609 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8260869565 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30434782609 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282446964206 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780241189804 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616715366597 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196457316071 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381987399294 0.056905535591 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.