NOWADAYS THE WAY MANY PEOPLE INTERACT WITH EACH OTHER HAS CHANGED BECAUSE OF TECHNOLOGY.
IN WHAT WAYS HAS TECHNOLOGY AFFECTED THE TYPES OF RELATIONSHIPS POEPLE MAKE ?
HAS THIS BECOME A POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE DEVELOPMENT
A school of thought holds that individuals have changed their way in interaction. The key rationale for this situation is the affect of technology. In this essay, the author will prove why technology has made the relationships more close. Also, this is a positive development.
It is understandable why technology helps the relationships of individuals more tight. The first thing that needs metioning is convenience. In comparison to the past, people had to go to a particular destination to meet and talk . Also, if they were in a long distance relationship, they had to send letters which is only recieved after a few days. As today, many inventions served people to interact have born. Individuals can enjoy every moment together and it makes their relationship more tight . Not only the convenience but also the intelligence of technology participates in improving people’s relationships. Base on a true story on BBC’s news, there was a girl who got lost her parents in 2015. Then a kind women found her and decided to post her picture on facebook. This kind of social media can realize her face because it had appeared in her family’s picture on Facebook. In the end, an announcement sent to her parents and they got their child back. Thus, technology is a vital factor to tight people’s relationship.
Like the author have already mentioned, technology helps people to interact. So this is a good development. If people can interact with others any time, they will do that more often. Not only with their family but also stranghers that they want to make friends. Besides, due to the appearance of technology, individuals can develop their jobs. It is obvious that many job interviews are now sent by emails and phones instead of letters or face to face.
In conclusion, the appearance of technology has made the relationships people make more tight and it has become a positive developments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 229, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... particular destination to meet and talk . Also, if they were in a long distance r...
^^
Line 6, column 499, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d it makes their relationship more tight . Not only the convenience but also the i...
^^
Line 6, column 716, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'woman'?
Suggestion: woman
...t lost her parents in 2015. Then a kind women found her and decided to post her pictu...
^^^^^
Line 12, column 124, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'development'?
Suggestion: development
...more tight and it has become a positive developments.
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, then, thus, as to, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06603773585 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04461454611 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540880503145 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.375062406 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.0434782609 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.8260869565 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30434782609 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282446964206 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780241189804 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616715366597 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196457316071 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381987399294 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 50.2224549098 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.