The information about the number of traveller to Ashdown Museum during the year before and after the reconstruction and the result of surveys asking feedback to the visitor about how satisfied during their trip in two periods of time is depicted by the rendered table and pie charts. The data has been calibrated in the number of people and percentage.
To begin with, 7400 people visited Ashdown Museum the year before refurbishment. However, the percentage of travellers who were dissatisfied was 40. 30% and 15% of visitors were satisfied and very happy about their trip respectively. Moreover, 5% of travellers did not give any response. The proportion of visitors who were very unhappy, it accounted for 10%.
Moving towards, after rebuilding, 92000 travellers visited Ashdown Museum. There had been drastic increase seen in the number of visitors who were satisfied and very happy about their trip after the reconstruction, it comprised to 40% and 35% correspondingly. Although the percentage of dissatisfied visitors was decreased by 25, a dramatic increase was noticed in very dissatisfied travellers, it was 35%. Moreover, the same number of visitors did not interest to give any feedback after the reconstruction, which was only 5%.
To sum up, it can be vividly manifested that after the reconstruction of Ashdown Museum a lot of travellers were attracted.
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 56
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is most important goal some people however think that other types of progress and equally important for a country 61
- Government should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections untill 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28767123288 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10921688276 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502283105023 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.0 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 63.3339364006 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91666666667 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39465477758 0.215688989381 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131977937839 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107055796216 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236665636421 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109921254075 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.