Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals. I agree with the author’s statement considering the majority of the situations in real world where People elect their leader expecting to fulfill their needs which will be grounded and reasonable consensus. I also believe politicians will be having many constraints like time, budget, and a lot more to pick the idea to implement.
For example, recently the whole world is undergoing a serious pandemic which has affected many lives. These are the times where the need of government and politicians will be more required for the people, during these days politicians should be thinking to solve the real-time problems like the supply of oxygen increasing the bed counts in already established hospitals rather than building a new hospital which might take time to develop.
There might be situations where we need to think for the future generations and their development
which will have a lot of factors to compare, for example, If we consider the case of jobs generation for youth in 2 years or less and also tasks like bringing back the black money are considered as elusive ideals because situations in the future may not be the same as now and to bring a big change or to implement elusive ideals it will be requiring a lot more support and a lot of people involvement and support are required which are harder tasks to be implemented in a short span of time.
I strongly believe the conditions around the politicians also play a major factor to pick what to pursue example, Politicians in countries like China who has constant and stable government can implement elusive ideas because they will be having ample amount of time and support to complete the task or ideas that will be implemented.
So by the above statements, I strongly believe that conditions and time around the politician plays a crucial role in pursuing the common ground reasonable consensus or to pursue elusive ideals
- Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities 70
- In a laboratory study of two different industrial cleansers CleanAll was found to remove 40 more dirt and kill 30 more bacteria than the next best cleanser Furthermore a study showed that employees working at buildings cleaned with cleanAll used far fewer 58
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States Only about 2 percent of customers have compla 60
- Politicians should pursue common ground and reasonable consensus rather than elusive ideals 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 126, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun years is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...jobs generation for youth in 2 years or less and also tasks like bringing back the b...
^^^^
Line 10, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onditions and time around the politician plays a crucial role in pursuing the com...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 333.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01801801802 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72325518847 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501501501502 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 23.0359550562 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 157.741085327 60.3974514979 261% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 208.875 118.986275619 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 41.625 23.4991977007 177% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302947437999 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.208547750619 0.0831039109588 251% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.265767998411 0.0758088955206 351% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180028097823 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.163721083898 0.0667264976115 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.0 14.1392134831 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 48.8420337079 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 12.1743820225 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.4 11.2143820225 164% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.