It was observed that in some countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects at university.
What are the cases? What effects does this have?
It is true that in some parts of the world, students are being more oblivious to enroll in scientific courses at university. Thus, it is the aim of this essay to unveil the reasons behind this phenomenon and propose some repercussions resulting from it.
The main causes of the problem are hard curriculum and low average salaries. To begin with, science-related degrees contain deeper and more theoretical knowledge compared to social degrees. In other words, science subjects necessitate students to do dry researches instead of taking part in practical internships like those studying the other sector. As a result, only students who are truly passionate about science and willing to stay indoors all day, isolating themselves, can pursue this field. Another justification worth mentioning is that graduates with a degree in society earn relatively higher wages than those with science degrees. For example, it is reported that economists make about more than $130,000 a year with five-year experience, doubling the figure for physicians. This directly suggests that investing in studying social subjects produces better outcomes than in science subjects.
The problem has some adverse bearings on individuals as well as the society. In terms of individuals, although scientists devote themselves fully to better shaping recognition about the world, some may find it hard to maintain a normal life. To be specific, they achieve little money to support their families; consequently, they give up working and turn to another job which is not what they desire. What can be inferred from this is that low salaries make scientists less determined to contribute. Turning to the society, less students choose science subjects at university means a lack of workers in the labor market. Hence, researches are carried out much slower, thus culminating in the degradation in the amount of knowledge.
In conclusion, difficult courses and little wages result in less science students. Therefore, scientists have to abandon their passion and the world will receive less findings.
- It was observed that in some countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects at university What are the cases What effects does this have 89
- In some countries more and more adults are living with their parents after graduating from college University or even after finding a job Do the advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 89
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil 78
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil 56
- In some countries young people are not only richer but also safer and healthier than ever before However they are less happy What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 532, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun students is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...d to contribute. Turn into the society, less students choose science subjects at uni...
^^^^
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun findings is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...heir passion and The world will receive less findings.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, for example, i guess, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in other words, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38650306748 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8360815929 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613496932515 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5729806795 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.294117647 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0588235294 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230504174211 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0630093015316 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542674865125 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119608386227 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438548590416 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.