Nowadays the way people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
It has often been argued that distinct behavior has been noticed with the advancement of technology in lives. Technology has forced people to follow the practical path rather, thinking from heart and has forced people to see benefits in relationship. In my opinion, every development has pros and cons so the commencement of artificial intelligence has given benefits on larger scale.
To begin with, it has commonly been noticed that in the current era people has adopted the technicality in there day to day life. There was a time when people used to wait longer to get the reply from friends, relatives or their loved ones, however, this waiting time has been cut down to zero with the evolvement of different messaging apps. For instance, a well-known chatting application called watsapp has given the people leverage to talk in seconds. Not only people can message and talk but also the facility of video calling through another software called skype has made people realize that a person living abroad seems with us the right moment. Therefore, technology has made people maintain their relationship in their busy schedule as well.
Moreover, it has been seen that artificial intelligence has some brawbacks as it deprived people from human feelings but has played a vital role in professional relationships. People looking for jobs abroad has got the facility to communicate easily with the interference of technology. Outing plans can be fixed within a day without waiting for a long. Also, it has benefited our soldier working for nation, as they can interact with their family member any time they want. Though the negatives are there but has been overlooked by the positives. For example, in recent survey done by times of India states that 60% of professional’s feels that application like linkdin has kept people close knitted by maintain their professional relations on good note.
To conclude, I would rather say that technology has improved the thought process to take relationship seriously by talking and getting mingled with the person of your choice and make yourself socially aware of what is happening.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-10 | Surbhithegirl | 61 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | tranvanngoc | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-13 | jacknn | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | pourya | 61 | view |
| 2021-06-24 | urvi eva | 73 | view |
- Your friend had made a plan for you to see a movie together but you cannot join him her You ve found another friend who can go instead of you Write a letter to your friend In your letter Explain why you cannot go anymore Say who can go instead of you Say 70
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food Do you agree or disagree 67
- You recently read an article in a newspaper about your childhood friend with whom you have lost contact for a long time Write a letter to the editor In your letter Say which edition and when did the article appear Explain why you lost contact with your fr 81
- News plays an important part of most people s lives Why is news so important to people Why is so much news dedicated to bad news Should the news focus on good news instead 84
- Your child is going away on a school trip for three days to another country The head teacher wants some parents to join the trip and you would like to go Write a letter to the head teacher In your letter Say why you would like to go Suggest what you could 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 348.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14367816092 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31911543099 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76174392164 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580459770115 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8809248778 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.333333333 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231455597531 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757139525157 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466604351976 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142136716299 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334463534254 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.