Irrefutably, a debatable issue is going on the uses of freshwater. One section of the society reckons that individuals have full authority of consuming water provided by the regime, whereas, others ponder that higher authority must control on the consumption of dearth of water .after contemplating, I will give minutiae about both notions as well as my imagination in forthcoming crumbs.
To embark with, there are innumerable uses of freshwater as much the requirement of inhabitants, the cardinal point to be considered is that mortals believe it is a natural resource and every living being has the right to utilize it as much they need water. For instance, daily household chores such as cleaning, mopping, cooking, washing and many more require much water. Thus, daily works need too much water.
On the flip side, authority must take praiseworthy steps on the regulation of water as it is a natural resource which is non renewable and going to diminished day by day. Legislation should put restrictions on using of water, because some fellow creatures use excess water and waste it deliberately. To epitome, people leave the tap open while brushing, bathing, cleaning and many more cases. If higher authority take strict action on the wastage of water then we can save water for future generations. Hence, save the more water, more the life will be.
From my viewpoint, water is the basic necessity of human beings, so it must be save by taking strict laws by regime, so our offspring will not face any obstacle.
In conclusion, although water is a natural resource and we have full right to use it, it cannot be d3enied that it should be saved for coming generation.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: mrizkil
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 278, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ol on the consumption of dearth of water .after contemplating, I will give minutia...
^^
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...I will give minutiae about both notions as well as my imagination in forthcoming crumbs. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: GOING_TO_VBD[1]
Message: 'Going to' requires the base form: 'diminish'
Suggestion: diminish
...rce which is non renewable and going to diminished day by day. Legislation should put rest...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, then, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95390070922 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76851354887 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58865248227 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.5760904208 49.4020404114 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.416666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252470177813 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0884583001716 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681418957605 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130292412786 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060218177464 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.5 9.78957915832 209% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.